Tampilkan postingan dengan label top rated dvd players blu ray. Tampilkan semua postingan
Tampilkan postingan dengan label top rated dvd players blu ray. Tampilkan semua postingan

Sabtu, 07 Juni 2014

is 3 out of 5 stars good yahoo for buyinng a blu ray dvd player?

Q.


Answer
The most reliable player for blu ray disc player is the Panasonic. Three 3 is not a very good rating. Go online to Home Theater Magazine and read the reviews on blu ray disc player. I own a first generation player model BD-10 which is over 4 years old and I have had no problem playing over 300 blu ray disc movies. When AVATAR first came out many player (Sony, Samsung & LG the top brands) had problem playing the movie until you had the firmware update, while my Panasonic had no problem. The model BD-65 and BD-85 are the newest model from Panasonic. Hope this will help you out.

HD-DVD vs. Blu-Ray?

Q. I was wondering if there was a real difference between HD-DVD and Blu-Ray in quality and/or sound. What do you prefer? Have you chosen a side? Or are you waiting for a more dominant format? Paramount and Dreamworks the two top movie studios are supporting HD-DVD only while other studios are going strictly blu-ray. I need to know which one to buy but want to buy only one. Not both.


Answer
There are many differences between Blu-ray and HD DVD. I'll first specify the differences in hardware, before going into the format wars and sales.
Here are the basic hardware specs:

Blu-ray Disc, created by Sony, and Phllips, promoted by the Blu-ray Disc Association (comprising of over 250 members), is a next generation optical disc, using blue-violet, lasers, which have a better precism rate than standard DVD's therefore can read more holes in the metal foil, at a much higher rate of '"holes"" per square centimetre, than standard DVDs. This means Blu-ray Discs can hold 50GB of data double layer. Blu-ray Disc, uses Sun Microsystems BD Java application for interativity. Blu-ray Disc uses the following codecs for data commpresion which are MPEG 2 enhanced for HD, Microsofts VC1 and MPEG 4 AVC (h.264). Many of the older Blu-ray Discs use the MPEG 2 codec, with many of the newer discs using MPEG 4 AVC, except for Time Warner which use VC1. Blu-ray Disc uses LPCM, Dolby Digital Plus, Dolby Digital True HD, DTS, and DTS HD audio codecs along with Dolby Digital audio. The mandatory codecs (audio) for stand alone players are Dobly Digital, PCM, LPCM, DTS, and one of the lossless audio formats. If the other codecs for audio aren't present, the signal is downgraded. Blu-ray Disc, has profiles 1, which can only play the feature film, and stand alone special features, and normal BD J navigation, while profile 1.1 can enable PIP content and 2 has internet access. Except for computer drives and the PS3 drives cannot be upgraded via firmware upgrades. However Profile 1 players can play the main features fine on Profile 1.1 and 2 discs, but will offer limited special feature capablility. Blu-ray Discs can reach a huge 48Mbps bitrate during film playback.

HD DVD also uses the basic principle of blue lasers, HD DVD, is a format promoted by Tohsiba and Microsoft, backed by the DVD Forum, promoted by the HD DVD PROMOTIONAL GROUP. HD DVD was created, as a rival to Blu-ray as after blue laser diodes were created, a group of electronic giants left, to create the Blu-ray Disc Association. This put Tohsiba under pressure, so they started, the AOD (Advanced Optical Disc) project. AOD was backed by the DVD Forum, and was then called HD DVD. HD DVD holds 30 GB of data double layer, having a much smaller capacity compared to Blu-ray Disc. HD DVD uses Microsofts HDi interativity layer and accomodates MPEG 2, VC1 and MPEG 4 AVC (h.264) codecs, Most of the released HD DVD discs are compressed using the VC1 codec with a few MPEG 4 AVC discs, and very few/ or no MPEG 2 discs.
HD DVD uses DTS HD , Dolby Digital True HD, Dolby Digital Plus, DTS, and Dolby Digital audio, all of the codecs are MANDOTORY for all players. All HD DVDs can access all special features, and require no profile upgrades, all players have PIP enabled and internet connectivity. HD DVD is an upgrade from DVD so it benifits, with good compatibility and stability, as it's very close to DVD, unlike Blu-ray which is a totally new technology. HD DVDs can reach during a film a max bitrate of 30.8Mbps.

As you see except for capacity HD DVD is a far better format, which is finalised and offers full capability, as it has all mandotory audio codecs unlike Blu-ray therefore will have better audio capablities. Blu ray however has slightly better visual quality, which isn't noticiable. HD DVD also has a better interactivity layer, HDi is arguably better than BD J especially due to all players being able to access all special features. Blu-ray disc is an unfinalised product, with flaws, with computer drives and the PS3 being the only full feature players around. These facts show that HD DVD is by far better in terms of technology except for capacity. as HD DVD is finalised, like the Betamax, offers higher quality, but limited space, causing potential limitations. HD DVD is also slightly cheaper, although the cheapest HD DVD players do not offer full HD output, or offers limited connections. Although, visually theoritically Blu-ray Disc is slightly better, as it has higher bitrates, reaching up to 48 Mbps, unlike HD DVD which can do around 30Mbps. A disc with an higher bitrate will effectively have a better quality image, but will most likely be un noticialble by the lay person, and only a really keen eye will be able to notice the difference. However with having higher bitrates, means more stress for hardware. Computers find high bitrate MPEG 4 AVC films a pain to decode, and maybe in the future some standalone players might slutter a bit, especially in the low end sector, that is yet to be introduced. However due to HD DVD's more finalised format, I for one believe it's like the Betamax a more consumer freindly format, which is complete, while Blu-ray Disc is a product in development. Overall due to not all Blu-ray Discs having full support for Profile 1.1 and 2 and not being able to decode some lossless audio tracks such as Dolby Digital True HD and DTS HD without lossing quality, I'll have to say technology wise, HD DVD is better, except for capacity, which was (hello?) what the Betamax lacked in. So, even with the low bitrates, currently HD DVD is a better format by far, while Blu-ray is a better format for the future due to higher bitrates, and better capacity, like the VHS. Many people can argue that Blu-ray Disc is a better format, but I for one believe that as Blu-ray Disc is an unfinalised format, you can't possibily class it as a better format, as Blu-ray is a format that will grow into something good, in the future, but for now, all we worry about is the current quality, and in terms of interactivity and audio HD DVD surely wins this round, like the Betamax did. Also I forgot to mention BD+ gave a lot of early standalone player investers a lot of grief, they wouldn't play, giving a "friendly"" message to contact the manufacturer. It didn't effect PC drives although or PS3s.

But technology isn't the key, technology wise superior Betamax didn't win the format war against VHS. Now it's time to get to the sales side, which is the most important for you and me.

Blu-ray Disc is leading the sales and in terms of support has over 70% of the hi-def media share.

Blu-ray Disc is exclusively supported by:
Warner Brothers Studios, New Line Studios, HBO Video,
Sony Pictures Entertainment (Columbia, Columbia Tristar, Screen Gems)
Buena Vista (Walt Disney, Miramax Pictures, Hollywood Pictures, Touchstone Pictures, and Pixar Annimation)
20th Century Fox and Fox Search Light
MGM
Lionsgate
Blu-ray is backed neutral by BBC video for now, but is backed exclusively by the National Geograhic, and many other minor studios, especially foreign studios.

HD DVD is backed by
Universal Studios
Viacom including Dreamworks, Paramount, Dreamworks Annimation, MTV and Nickolodiam Films.
It is also backed by the minor companies such as The Wiensten Company and Focus Features. It is backed non exclusively by BBC.

Sales wise, Blu-ray has since Warners announchment 80% of the software sales in the US, with around 75% for this year. Last year Blu-ray Discs sold out HD DVD by 2 to 1. Hardware sales wise since Warners announchment Blu-ray has 60% of the total sales, once peaking at 93%. Note this does not include the millions of PS3's which people buy due to the profile hassels, with Blu-ray, and due to it's low cost. If PS3's were included HD DVD would have a much lower hardware percentage margin. Sales wise and studio wise Blu-ray Disc is the winner, meaning that Blu-ray is most likely to WIN the format war. In Europe Blu-ray has around 80% of the market, with Japan having 90% and Australia having a huge 95% of the market. Blu-ray sales wise has the edge. Also Blu-ray is supported exclusively by rental giant Blockbuster, with Target going Blu only.

People remark, HD DVD will win due to it's low hardware prices, it should be noted that at the end of the format war Sony's Betamax was actually lower in price, than the VHS system, HD DVD is basically repeating the Betamax. VHS actually started it's winning streak when it had 70% of the market share, which (oh my god!!!!) Blu-ray has now due to Warner. Many people say that Blu-ray is being the Beta, due to being better than HD DVD in terms of technology, Actually it is not, it's bad in terms of audio, many players don't support all the codecs, and has an unfinalised BD J interactivity platform. Sure it has a higher data capacity but VHS also had a higher recording time. For once, Blu-ray is turning out to be the winning format. Blu-ray Disc has endless support, a strong BDA, and has plenty of licensing, unlike HD DVD which basically Tohsiba manufacturing all of them. The main thing that made the BETA lose, was that it had in sufficiant licensing, like HD DVD. But as we see, it's the consumer who losses, in format battles, HD DVD has a good chance being the Betamax, in all aspects. What you have to think about is the sales not the technology. Blu-ray Disc will be the better format, in a few years time, but currently Blu-ray Disc lacks in audio and interactivity to be branded technically better than HD DVD. HD DVD is the format for today, Blu-ray Disc is the format for tomorrow. That is why Blu-ray is winning, it's a format with heaps of potential, sure the early adopters miss out on a bit of interactivity, but Blu-ray Disc has room to grow, not only in movies, but also in data storage and software. Blu-ray Disc is tomorrows optical media in the making, while HD DVD was the format that was made for today. Actually Blu-ray Disc was a huge step from DVD, and was a totally new technology, that wasn't finalised, but won the hearts of many consumers and companies due to the potential. ""The Future is Blu"". Don't go for todays format go for tomorrows format.

It is clear t




Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Minggu, 02 Februari 2014

Is there any difference in playing a dvd on a blu ray compared to a dvd player?




stoker7878


Is there a difference?


Answer
It depends on what blu-ray and DVD player you are comparing. but generally the DVD will look better played in a Blu-ray because it is a native high-definition video component.

All Blu-ray players will attempt to up-convert the digital content of the DVD disc, so as to improve the picture quality. Many DVDs played on a blu-ray player will look better than it was originally recorded. There are also many up-converting DVD players that also feature the same technology to improve the picture quality. Of course you must have a HDTV or monitor that is capable of displaying the improved picture.

All up-converted chip-sets are not created equal, and they are not always 100% successful. The best chip-set is the HQV chip-set, which as a success rate some where in the upper 90% range. The chip-set is used in a few current model Denon Blu-ray players and a lot of first and second generation top-end HD-DVD and Blu-ray players. Denon also uses this chip-set in some of their upper end DVD players.

If you own a large collection of DVD and you don't want to re-purchase then, then the Denon models are worth investigating.

Below are links to the Dennon and HQV websites;

Good Luck!

Denon: http://www.usa.denon.com/ProductDetails/High-Definition-Video-Components.asp

HQV: http://www.hqv.com/

is 3 out of 5 stars good yahoo for buyinng a blu ray dvd player?

Q.


Answer
The most reliable player for blu ray disc player is the Panasonic. Three 3 is not a very good rating. Go online to Home Theater Magazine and read the reviews on blu ray disc player. I own a first generation player model BD-10 which is over 4 years old and I have had no problem playing over 300 blu ray disc movies. When AVATAR first came out many player (Sony, Samsung & LG the top brands) had problem playing the movie until you had the firmware update, while my Panasonic had no problem. The model BD-65 and BD-85 are the newest model from Panasonic. Hope this will help you out.




Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Rabu, 01 Januari 2014

are there any good free cd and dvd burning suites similar to nero?

top rated dvd players blu ray on Best Blu Ray Dvd Player | DVD Player Review
top rated dvd players blu ray image



yoman477


I have been looking for a new cd and dvd burning suite similar to nero but free. Is there anything like this that is good quality? Or is there a way to download the full nero version free?


Answer
I highly recommend DVD NexT Copy neXt Tech. It is the best all-in-one DVD Burning Software and it pretty much blows away all the other DVD copying software on the market in terms of copy quality and speed.
It enables you copy protected DVD movies and burn it to play in your home DVD player.

On top of that, it automatically converts all standard video files for you to play in your home DVD player. If you are thinking of burning your downloaded movies or the videos that you have captured from your digital camcorder or digital camera, have no worries, this is the perfect DVD Burning Software for you.

It's advanced functionality combined with quality and speed in a simple and user-friendly interface makes it ideal for home and office use. One of its best feature is its ability to burn Blu-ray discs - you can even copy 10 of your standard DVD movies to fit in 1 Blu-ray disc.

What's also nice about it is its ability to copy a DVD movie to a mobile gadget such as iPod, PSP, Zune etc. This feature can really be handy if you want to view your dvd movies in different DVD players.

That is why it is the highest rated DVD Burning Software on our website.

But the most innovative thing about DVD neXt COPY neXt Tech is the built in neXt Tech Updater software. What it does is it allows you the customer to pretty much create your own fix and updates for the new movies, as they are released. Now that is what I call live support!

Anyhow you can read more DVD NexT Copy neXt Tech here:
http://www.easydvdburning.com/software/pc-dvd-copying/dvd-next-copy-next-tech.html

Is there any difference in playing a dvd on a blu ray compared to a dvd player?




stoker7878


Is there a difference?


Answer
It depends on what blu-ray and DVD player you are comparing. but generally the DVD will look better played in a Blu-ray because it is a native high-definition video component.

All Blu-ray players will attempt to up-convert the digital content of the DVD disc, so as to improve the picture quality. Many DVDs played on a blu-ray player will look better than it was originally recorded. There are also many up-converting DVD players that also feature the same technology to improve the picture quality. Of course you must have a HDTV or monitor that is capable of displaying the improved picture.

All up-converted chip-sets are not created equal, and they are not always 100% successful. The best chip-set is the HQV chip-set, which as a success rate some where in the upper 90% range. The chip-set is used in a few current model Denon Blu-ray players and a lot of first and second generation top-end HD-DVD and Blu-ray players. Denon also uses this chip-set in some of their upper end DVD players.

If you own a large collection of DVD and you don't want to re-purchase then, then the Denon models are worth investigating.

Below are links to the Dennon and HQV websites;

Good Luck!

Denon: http://www.usa.denon.com/ProductDetails/High-Definition-Video-Components.asp

HQV: http://www.hqv.com/




Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Senin, 16 Desember 2013

what is the most important part of a home theater system?

top rated dvd players blu ray on LG BP325W 3D Blu-ray Disc Player - 1080p - Compare Prices and Reviews ...
top rated dvd players blu ray image



c.lane


I'am looking at putting together a home theater system. i just
purched a new hd 1080p tv now for the sound where should i put
most of my money in the receiver or the speakers???



Answer
Everything is Equal.

Speakers
You want to try to stay with the same brand of speakers. Myself I love Boston Acoustics. You should go to several stored with your DVD's and listen to everything in your budget. go with what sounds best to you.


Power.
Amplification it's what actually makes your speakers work. You want to make sure that the RMS or constant power rating ins't to much for your speakers. Also make sure it has plenty of inputs for your system to grow and cover what you have now.

Cables. The wires that sent signals to where they need to go.
Don't skimp here, the bargin bin is something to avoid, but you don't have to buy a 100.00 3 ft optical cable either. Mon$ster makes good product, but you do not need the top of the line it's too expensive and is overrated, just go with something of good quality and construction.

Speaker Placement is a biggie, you want to make sure you get a good even placement, Put your powered sub in the corner.

DVD players. A next Gen Player is a great idea.

HD-DVD and Blu-ray both have there flaws and there peaks.
there are a few players that will do both. but they run about 1200.00 You can get a PS3 599.99 and an Elite 499.00 and the HD-DVD add on for the 360 170.00 I think for about the same price, and have both next gen video game systems.

Don't forget the couch, thats a big key also, thst where your going to be sitting anyways.

If I had to choose between Receiver or Speakers. Id go with the receiver because it's easer to get new speakers than it is to redo the receiver.

what are the top 10 reason to get a PS3 if a already had a xbox360 4 years?




Joseph


I love the exclusive but i dont know if it is worth it.


Answer
1.blu-ray player
2.dvd player
3.free online
4.idc what anyone says the graphics r better
5.better games
6.microsoft r money whores
7.JAK and Daxtar
8.there r more stupid little kids online on xbox live who think they r kool cause they have an m rated game(i HATE squekers)
9.u can play with the vita or psp through connect play
10IT ONLY DOES EVERYTHING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!




Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Selasa, 05 November 2013

what are the top 10 reason to get a PS3 if a already had a xbox360 4 years?

top rated dvd players blu ray on LG BP325W 3D Blu-ray Disc Player - 1080p - Compare Prices and Reviews ...
top rated dvd players blu ray image



Joseph


I love the exclusive but i dont know if it is worth it.


Answer
1.blu-ray player
2.dvd player
3.free online
4.idc what anyone says the graphics r better
5.better games
6.microsoft r money whores
7.JAK and Daxtar
8.there r more stupid little kids online on xbox live who think they r kool cause they have an m rated game(i HATE squekers)
9.u can play with the vita or psp through connect play
10IT ONLY DOES EVERYTHING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Im looking for a good 37-42 inch LCD Television and brands i should look for or avoid buying?




Jeff Shrum


Im looking for a tv that has good video and audio but more specifically video quality. And i was wondering if there are any brand of televisions that i should avoid getting or keep my eye out for.


Answer
I agree with KV92's assessment about brands. If you are on a budget, I would particularly recommend Panasonic.

Since video quality is important to you, keep in mind that a television's picture will never be better than its source. That cheap DVD player that worked for your old square TV may not play well with widescreen (16:9 or 1.85) TVs; ditto for the standard cable service.

Whenever possible, try to get HD content, either by upgrading your cable (and cable box) or watching certain (but not all) stations over the airwaves. Also, when buying DVD movies, try to get the widescreen (albeit never HD) versions.

If you do watch fullscreen (4:3 or 1.33) content, be sure to adjust the aspect ratio accordingly -- you'll want to see a square picture with black bars on the sides. Otherwise, the picture will fill the widescreen by being 50% too wide. On your remote control, the button to adjust aspect ratio may be called "picture size", "format," "display," or similar (every manufacturer has their own term for it). Some Insignia televisions actually have an "auto mode" for aspect ratio, which I think is intelligent.

On a 42" television, you might be able to tell that a Blu-Ray movie is sharper than a DVD, but it's not like the DVD is going to pixellate or otherwise look ugly; it will just look slightly softer. Still very watchable.

Whatever you're connecting to the TV, be sure to use HDMI or Component cords. The cheap Composite cords that come packaged with DVD and even Blu-Ray players won't get you the best video, though you can use their red and white parts for stereo audio if you're using Component cords for video. (meanwhile, HDMI carries audio and video)

So get a Blu-Ray player if you're so inclined, but at the very least, consider a new DVD player if your old one is cheap -- pay for a name brand, but don't pay extra for the "upscaling" feature, which can actually distort the picture.

Other things you don't have to pay extra for:

- 120 Hz or 240 Hz. HD content actually tops out at 60 Hz, which is the standard refresh rate of LCDs. Don't believe the marketing hype about "motion blur" -- it may have been an issue for early LCDs, but not any that you'd find in a store today. Also, (pointlessly) upconverting a 60 Hz video tends to make it look cartoonish.

- 1080p. Anyone who says they can tell the difference between 1080p and 720p from more than five inches away is lying. There's nothing wrong with 1080p, it just shouldn't be the tie-breaker in your decision.




Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Senin, 19 Agustus 2013

Which is better Xbox 360 or PS3 and why?

top rated dvd players blu ray on ... Inch LCD Twin Screen CAR DVD Player USB SD Built IN Battery | eBay
top rated dvd players blu ray image



Ryan


I am planning on buying a new gaming console for my house. Which is better Xbox 360 or PS3 and why?


Answer
The PS3 is the obvious choice here. In short, it has better reliability, multimedia capabilities, a large list of exclusives and more coming out in 2009 and in the future, it will have over-the-top graphical capabilities (google âHeavy Rainâ). And to those who say the Xbox 360 is cheaper, well then just look at the following list:

With the PS3, you get:
-A Blu-Ray player, which if you wanted one of equal value would blow at least a $700 hole in your wallet, plus a mean DVD-upconverter
-Free online service, the Playstation Network, which is only a few steps behind Xbox Live these days
-An ever-growing list of exclusives, like Resistance 2, LittleBig Planet, Motorstorm: Pacific Rift, Metal Gear Solid 4 and in the future: inFamous, Killzone 2, God of War 3, Uncharted 2, L.A. Noire, Heavy Rain and Massive Action Game (M.A.G.âin which over 256 players will be able to play on the same map at the same time)
-More flexible in terms of hardware, e.g. swappable HDD, USB mini cable, etc.
-Built in, superior Wi-Fi
-Web browser
-A super sleek system complete with chrome trim and a slot loading disc drive

With the Xbox 360, you get:
-DVD Player/upconverter
-Xbox live, which is $60/year, and not even worth it
-Halo 3 and Gears of War 2 (thatâs a lot of exclusives compared to the PS3, if you ask me: P)
-Ummâ¦canât really say anything about non-proprietaryness, because Microsoft inflates the prices for their accessories.
-A 1 in 3 failure rate (it's not "if", it's "when")
-Many people are on their 5th or 6th 360's already because of RROD, and my friend is on his 11th!

So hereâs a quick run-down of what you must buy with the PS3 and 360:

PS3:
Console $300
Game $50
Controller $55
Charger $2-10--any USB mini cable will do
Total: $407

Really, if you bought all the things the PS3 offers SEPERATELY, you would be able to buy roughly 3 PS3's with that money.

Xbox 360:
Console $300
Game $60
Controller $60
Play and Charge kit x2 $60
Xbox Live $60
Wi-Fi $100
Total: $640

Thatâs not cheaper, so get a grip on it! Sony said that they made the PS3 to last a decade. The multi-platform games are using about 25% of the PS3's graphical potential. So there's lots of wiggle room in the future for much more brighter, detailed and massive environments.

On the other hand, most multiplatform games are using about 98% of the 360âs potential. And they look about the same. At this rate in 1 year, the PS3 will have outshone the 360 graphic wise. Itâs just that the 8-core Cell Broadband Processor is very complex, and takes developers time to get used to. And they are getting the hang of things. The PS3 has a very good reliability rate: only 0.2% failure rate (note the decimal), while Xbox 360's have a 30% failure rate. So, for every 1000 of both consoles produced, 2 PS3's are defective, whilst about 330 Xbox 360's are defective. The numbers speak for themselves. Many game developers have OPENLY stated that in the near future, and right now, they will use the PS3 as a lead-developing platform, and then they will port the games to the 360.

Also, many Xbox fanboys will say "Sure, LIVE is 60 bucks a year, but you get what you pay for." Isn't this like a Sony fanboy saying "Sure, PS3 is a 100 bucks more, but that is *pretty much* all you pay for?

So in conclusion, the PS3 is betterâyou get the most bang for your buck, and it's an incredibly advanced all-in-one home media center hub. You can even install Linux or Windows XP and use it as a computer-legally! While with the Xbox 360, Microsoft will ban your 360 from certain things, if you install the OS at all (just try to bypass the security).

Hope this helps!

How long will Blu-Ray be around?




Michael


DVD stayed on top for about 10 years. Will Blu-Ray follow the same trend and be OK into the year 2020ad?
Yeah, I agree that there will be no more solid media systems to replace BluRay. I have converted many of my DVD's to digital media files on my computer.



Answer
It's hard to say... It's been a long road, Blu-Ray won the HD-DVD vs Blu-Ray war in early 2008 and went into 2008 Holiday season very strong. Slowly we're seeing new releases being discounted to near DVD prices (e.g. The Dark Knight special editon DVD was only a few dollars cheaper than the more featured Dark Knight Blu-Ray edition earlier this month).

Someone made a short list of benefits of DVD and listed the format being recordable as one of them. Blu-Ray writers are on their way! Also many of the Blu-Ray players on the market now support a little known format called AVCHD. The AVCHD format calls for High Definition video burned to a DVD+R/DVD-R disc. Meaning if you have an HD camcorder you don't have to invest in a Blu-Ray burner in order to burn your High Definition home movies and watch them on your HDTV.

As far as technology goes. We've kind of reached a limit with High Definition. We're dealing with limitations of the human eye. Blu-Ray movies sold today can output at a max of 1080p (24 or 30 fps) that means 1920x1080 pixels refreshed 30 times per second. For a HDTV smaller than a 65" screen at average viewing distance (~12 feet) you can't really improve beyond Blu-Ray and benefit people.

Technical facts:
Consider that high-end digital projectors used in movie theaters have a native resolution of: 4096 x 2160 and project on an average 55.8 foot (672") screen. a 56" HDTV (large by today's standards) would be 12x smaller than that and yet displaying a resolution of 1920x1080!

What that means is with 1080i/1080p HD the picture quality for a well calibrated HDTV at optimal screen size (around 61" for average viewing distance) will exceed the picture quality of movie theater grade digital projector by a little more than x2! You're getting a better quality picture at home and you could given go up to a 100"+ screen with a 1080p projector and still exceed movie house quality. That's really just how good Blu-Ray is.

The real problem with this technology is people not having large enough (or well calibrated enough) HDTVs to show off it's resolution advantages.

HDTVs will continue to get better at displaying 1080p (namely through improved refresh rates and contrast), but I doubt the 1080p standard is going to be boken any time soon and that means Blu-Ray is safe.

Now if we see a major break through in Holographic television or something, Blu-Ray may go away.... but that's a long ways coming.




Powered by Yahoo! Answers